![]() ![]() Mac Nally R and Horrocks G (2000) Landscape-scale conservation of an endangered migrant: The swift parrot Lathamus discolor in its winter range. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, Australia In: Saunders DA, Arnold GW, Burbidge AA and Hopkins AJM (eds) Nature Conservation: The Role of Remnants of Native Vegetation, pp 65-77. Loyn RH (1987) Effects of patch area and habitat on bird abundances, species numbers and tree health in fragmented Victorian forests. Linhart H and Zucchini W (1986) Model Selection. Laurance WF (1991) Edge effects in tropical forest fragmentation: application of a model for the design of nature reserves. James FC, Hess CA and Kufrin D (1997) Species-centered environment analysis: indirect effects of fire history on red-cockaded woodpeckers. Hurvich CM and Tsai CL (1990) The impact of model selection on inference in linear regression. Hocking RR (1976) The anlaysis and selection of variables in linear regression. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 1181-1201 Heikkinen RK and Neuvonen S (1997) Species richness of vascular plants in the subarctic landscape of northern Finland: modelling relationships to the environment. Greenberg R, Bichier P, Cruz Angon A and Reitsma R (1997) Bird populations in shade and sun coffee plantations in central Guatemala. American Statistician 41: 84-86įreedman DA (1983) A note on screening regression equations. Journal of Applied Ecology 34: 530-539įlack VF and Chang PC (1987) Frequency of selecting noise variables in subset regression analysis: a simulation study. John Wiley & Sons, New Yorkįisher M (1997) Decline in the juniper woodlands of Raydah Reserve in southwestern Saudi Arabia: a response to climate change? Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 6: 379-386įitzgibbon CD (1997) Small mammals in farm woodlands: the effects of habitat, isolation and surrounding land-use patterns. Conservation Biology 12: 340-352ĭraper NR and Smith H (1966) Applied Regression Analysis. Journal of Wildlife Management 61: 318-325ĭemaynadier PG and Hunter MLJ (1998) Effects of silvicultural edges on the distribution and abundance of amphibians in Maine. American Statistician 46: 74ĭelisle JM and Savidge JA (1997) Avian use and vegetation characterization of conservation program fields. The American Statistician 45: 90-96Ĭhristensen R (1992) Comment on Chevan and Sutherland. Conservation Biology 12: 1327-1337Ĭhevan A and Sutherland M (1991) Hierarchical partitioning. Journal of Biogeography 24: 703-715Ĭhapin TG, Harrison DJ and Katnik DD (1998) Influence of landscape pattern on habitat use by American marten in an industrial forest. Technometrics 37: 373-384īurbidge AA, Williams MR and Abbott I (1997) Mammals of Australian islands: factors influencing species richness. Conservation Biology 11: 406-421īrieman L (1995) Better subset regression using the nonnegative garrote. ![]() Ecological Applications 7: 552-563īolger DT, Scott TA and Rotenberry RT (1997b) Breeding bird abundance in an urbanizing landscape in coastal southern California. Journal of Biogeography 24: 49-60īolger DT, Alberts AC, Sauvajot RM, Potenza P and McCalvin C (1997a) Response of rodents to habitat fragmentation in coastal southern California. American Statistician 48: 113-117īöhning-Gaese K (1997) Determinants of avian species richness at different spatial scales. Annals Institute Statistics Mathematics 30: 9-14Īnderson-Sprecher R (1994) Model comparisons and R2. It is suggested that if the two approaches do not agree upon which of the independent variables are likely to be ‘significant’, then the deductions must be subject to doubt.Īkaike H (1978) A Bayesian Analysis of the minimum AIC procedure. Problem (1) may be explored by comparing two avenues, one in which a single ‘best’ regression model is sought and the other where all possible regression models are considered contemporaneously. There are two difficulties apart from the demonstrability issue itself: (1) multiple regression is plagued by collinear relationships in X and (2) any regression is designed to produce a function that in some way minimizes the overall difference between the observed and ‘predicted’ Ys, which does not necessarily equate to determining probable influence in a multivariate setting. Workers often want to assert that a given X has a major influence on Y, and so, by using this indirection to infer a probable causal relationship. ![]() In many large-scale conservation or ecological problems where experiments are intractable or unethical, regression methods are used to attempt to gauge the impact of a set of nominally independent variables ( X) upon a dependent variable ( Y). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |